A side-by-side reference for the three most common compliance frameworks engineering teams encounter. Each section covers what the framework is, who it applies
This skill provides a clear comparison of the three primary compliance frameworks frequently encountered by engineering and security teams: SOC 2, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS. It explains the scope and purpose of each framework, the types of data they protect, audit requirements, and key control areas such as access management, system operations, and incident response. The skill also highlights the typical evidence needed during audits, helping teams prepare for certification or enforcement with concrete examples from real-world implementations.
This skill is designed for compliance leads and security engineers at SaaS providers, healthcare technology companies, and organizations handling payment card data. It is especially useful for teams responsible for preparing or maintaining certifications, such as SOC 2 Type II reports, HIPAA Security Rule adherence, or PCI-DSS audits. Agency strategists working with clients in regulated industries will also find this comparison valuable for advising on risk management and compliance priorities.
Practitioners typically start by identifying which compliance framework applies based on their data types and customer requirements. Next, they map existing controls—like IAM policies, encryption standards, and incident response processes—against the framework’s specific criteria. Gathering audit evidence involves exporting logs, documenting access reviews, and compiling change management records for the relevant period. Finally, teams conduct self-assessments or engage third-party auditors to validate controls and prepare reports or attestations required by customers or regulators.
What type of audit is required for SOC 2? SOC 2 requires a third-party CPA attestation, with Type I focusing on control design and Type II on operational effectiveness over 6 to 12 months. How often do PCI-DSS assessments occur? PCI-DSS requires at least an annual assessment plus quarterly vulnerability scans. Do all vendors handling PHI need a Business Associate Agreement? Yes, HIPAA mandates a BAA with any vendor that processes or accesses protected health information on your behalf.
Attach this skill to a Metaflow agent task when your workflow involves compliance preparation, audit readiness, or vendor risk evaluation. The agent will provide side-by-side comparisons and practical control examples to help you identify gaps and prioritize remediation steps. This guidance supports decision-making around compliance frameworks and integrates smoothly with your broader security and operational workflows.
For broader context, see our roundup of claude skills marketing, and read Claude Code workflows for marketing agencies for related setup guidance.