Name the competitor, the content, and the gap — so the audit earns the strategy, not the score.
Analyze the social of our top 3 competitors.
The audit named the gap — no competitor owned pricing audit, offer clarity, or proof layer — and shipped the strategy: own the 3 gap topics, 2 posts a week each. The 3 topics earned 2.9x the engagement of the prior topics in 60 days. The template earned the win because it named the gap, not the score.
A competitor social analysis template is the audit that decides where the competitor wins and where they lose. It fixes the competitor, the content, and the gap — so the audit reads as a strategy, not a scorecard. A team that scores the competitor earns the report; a competitor social analysis template that names the gap earns the strategy and the win.
A reusable audit shape for the competitor — the competitor, the content, the gap — that earns the strategy and the win. The template fixes the shape so the audit reads as a strategy, not a scorecard.
The 3 to 5 competitors who own the audience you want — the ones with the reach and the engagement. The competitor is the part that earns the strategy, because an audit of 20 competitors earns the scorecard; an audit of 3 to 5 earns the gap and the win.
The posts that earn the competitor the reach — the topics, the formats, the cadence — that earn the audience. The content is the part that earns the gap, because an audit that scores the posts earns the report; an audit that names the topics and formats earns the strategy.
The topics the competitor does not own — the pain, the format, the cadence — that you can. The gap is the part that earns the win, because an audit that names the competitor strength earns the report; an audit that names the gap earns the strategy and the win.
The agent reads your competitors and their social, drafts the content audit and the gap, and ships the strategy. It pairs with the social content gap finder and the engagement pattern review templates.
The 3 to 5 who own the audience.
Agent names the topics, formats, cadence.
The topics they do not own.
Own the gap, re-run quarterly.
Names the gap, not the score
Owns the topic the competitor does not
Re-runs quarterly, not once
Pairs with the gap finder and engagement templates
Name the 3 to 5 competitors who own the audience, audit their topics, formats, and cadence, and name the gap they do not own. The audit reads as a strategy, not a scorecard, which is why it earns the win.
The audit that finds where the competitor wins and where they lose. A team that scores the competitor earns the report; a team that names the gap earns the strategy and the win.
3 to 5 — the ones who own the audience you want. An audit of 20 competitors earns the scorecard; an audit of 3 to 5 earns the gap and the win, because the focus is what earns the strategy.
The topics the competitor does not own — the pain, the format, the cadence — that you can. The gap is the part that earns the win, because an audit that names the gap earns the strategy; an audit that scores the competitor earns the report.