Spend and conversion data turned into a narrative and a ranked set of next actions.
Build the July paid report across Google and Meta. Explain why CPA went up and what to do.
CPA rose from $104 to $120, and 68% of that is CPC inflation concentrated in two generic ad groups — an auction change, not an account mistake. The controllable share is the landing page conversion rate decline, which is the top recommendation.
A PPC report template that stops at the numbers leaves the work undone. This one reconciles the period across channels, attributes the movement to specific campaigns and creatives, writes the explanation, and ends with ranked recommendations — the part a client or executive actually reads.
A repeatable structure for reporting paid performance: spend, conversions, cost per acquisition and return for the period, compared against the prior period and plan, plus the reasons behind the change and the actions queued next.
It decomposes the movement: how much came from spend level, how much from conversion rate, how much from cost per click, and which campaigns or creatives contributed most. "CPA rose" is not a finding; "CPA rose because CPC rose 22% in two ad groups" is.
Clients want the channel detail and the work log; executives want efficiency against plan and the decision you are asking for. The template produces both from one run rather than making you maintain two decks.
Monthly for the narrative, with a weekly pacing and anomaly check so nobody learns about a problem in a report. Weekly full reports mostly document noise and consume the time you should spend acting.
The agent pulls Google Ads, Meta, and LinkedIn performance plus GA4 or your analytics for downstream conversion, reconciles them against your plan numbers, and writes the narrative. Output goes to Docs, Slides, Slack, or a Looker Studio companion, and the run can be scheduled so the report exists before the meeting.
Ad platforms plus analytics, and the plan numbers you are measuring against.
Reporting window, and whether this run is the client version, the executive version, or both.
Numbers are reconciled; your time goes to the explanation and the recommendation.
Export to Docs or Slides, post to Slack, or set the run to recur monthly.
Decomposes change into spend, rate, and cost rather than reporting deltas
Ends in ranked recommendations, not a chart appendix
Produces client and executive versions from one run
Can be scheduled, so reporting stops being a monthly scramble
A periodic account of what your paid spend produced — spend, conversions, cost per acquisition, and return — together with the reasons behind the movement and the actions planned next. The reasoning is the part that justifies the report existing.
Headline efficiency against plan, then the two or three drivers of change, then work completed, then ranked recommendations, then appendix tables. Leading with tables is why most reports go unread.
Spend, conversions, cost per acquisition, and return as the core, with click-through and conversion rate as diagnostics. Impressions and clicks belong in the appendix — they explain movement but are not results.
Yes, and it reconciles them against one analytics source so channel-reported conversions do not silently double-count the same lead.