Check whether answer blocks are self-contained, structurally clean, and machine-readable — the properties AI answer engines need to lift a claim.
Audit extractability on our "ai marketing agent" and "seo automation" pages.
Six pages failed the self-contained claim check — their answer sentences referred to "the table above" or "as mentioned." Four are full rewrites; the rest are heading and schema tweaks that ship in one pass.
An ai content optimization template audits the gap between a page that ranks and a page that gets quoted. It checks whether answer blocks are self-contained, whether claims survive being lifted out of context, and whether the structure makes the answer the easiest thing to extract. Ranking is no longer enough — the page has to be extractable.
A per-page audit that scores extractability: whether headings are question-shaped, whether the first sentence answers, whether claims are self-contained, and whether schema marks up the answer. The output is a list of fixes, not a score.
Because an answer engine lifts the sentence, not the paragraph around it. A claim that refers to "the table above" or "as we discussed" fails extraction. Self-contained means the sentence reads true with no surrounding context.
An answer engine matches a prompt to a heading. "How much does X cost?" is a better heading match than "Pricing." The question shape also helps the human reader who scans, which is why it lifts engagement alongside extractability.
Question-shaped headings, answer-first paragraphs, self-contained claims, current dates, machine-readable schema, and AI crawler access in robots.txt. Each is scored per page so the report points at specific fixes.
The agent reads each page from your CMS or the rendered HTML, scores extractability against the rubric, and writes the fix list to Docs or Notion. It pairs with the FAQ extraction rewrite and schema-for-ai-search templates so a single audit produces the worklist for both.
The pages you want cited — usually commercial and definitional.
The agent scores each page against the rubric.
Grouped by fix type so one pass addresses many pages.
Pages marked rewrite feed the FAQ extraction rewrite template.
Scores extractability, not rankings — the property AI engines need
Flags context-dependent claims that fail lifting
Pairs with the FAQ and schema templates for the fix workflow
Output is a fix list per page, not a generic score
Question-shaped headings, answer-first paragraphs, self-contained claims, current dates, and machine-readable schema. Extractability is the property an answer engine needs to lift a clean claim, which is different from what ranking needs.
SEO optimizes for a ranked list of links; AEO optimizes for being the source an engine quotes inside a synthesized answer. They share fundamentals, but AEO adds extractability — structure that makes a specific sentence liftable.
Read the page as an answer engine would: does the first sentence under a question heading answer the question? Is the claim self-contained? Is the schema present? Score each, then prioritize fixes by citation potential.
Definitional pages ("what is X"), comparison pages, and the commercial pages that map to buyer prompts. Those are the ones an answer engine is most likely to quote — or to quote a competitor on.