Every page scored keep, refresh, consolidate, or prune — with the evidence behind each verdict.
Audit all 312 blog URLs. Verdict per page, and tell me what to prune.
Only 18 pages are true prune candidates — all zero-impression, no clear target query. The bigger opportunity is the 78 refreshes holding 34,000 monthly impressions between them. Twenty-eight consolidations have named merge targets and a redirect map.
A content audit template is only useful if it ends in a decision per URL. This one inventories the library, scores each page on traffic, intent match, and quality signals, and returns one of four verdicts — keep, refresh, consolidate, or prune — with the reason attached.
A structured review of everything you have published, scored against what it earns and whether it still matches intent. Where a content inventory just lists pages, an audit assigns each one a verdict and the action that follows.
Not by word count. It looks for pages with no unique information gain, no distinct target query, negligible impressions after a fair indexing window, and heavy overlap with a better page on your own site. Short and specific is fine; long and derivative is not.
Refresh when the page targets a query you want and simply lost currency or depth. Prune or redirect when the query has no business value, when a stronger page on your site already serves it, or when the page exists only because someone once needed a blog post.
Yes — URL, target query, impressions, clicks, position, verdict, reason, and next action come out as columns you can paste into Sheets. The scoring and the verdicts arrive filled in rather than as a template to complete.
The agent reads your CMS or sitemap for the inventory and Search Console for impressions, clicks, and position history, then compares pages against each other to find overlap. Verdicts export to Sheets or Linear, and pruned URLs come with redirect targets so the cleanup does not strand internal links.
A sitemap, a CMS connection, or a URL list — plus Search Console for performance.
Define what counts as negligible traffic and how old is too old for your category.
Pages arrive grouped by verdict with reasons, so you approve batches rather than URLs.
Apply refreshes, merges, and redirects, then re-point the internal links the audit flagged.
Ends in one of four verdicts per URL, never a score with no action
Thin content is judged on information gain, not word count
Consolidations arrive with a named merge target
Flags the internal links that break when you prune
Inventory every published URL, attach performance and intent data, compare pages against each other for overlap, then assign each one a verdict with a reason. The inventory is the easy part; the discipline is forcing a decision on every row.
A crawl or CMS export for the inventory and Search Console for performance. The judgment layer — deciding refresh versus prune — is where this template replaces the manual pass.
Removing genuinely low-value pages can help by concentrating crawl attention and internal authority on pages that earn. It is not a growth tactic on its own, and pruning pages that hold impressions is a self-inflicted loss — which is why every verdict here cites the data behind it.
Annually for the full library, quarterly for the pages that drive most of your traffic. High-velocity publishers benefit from a rolling audit where a slice gets reviewed each month.