Volume, difficulty, and intent scored against business relevance — then clustered into the pages you should actually build.
Run keyword research for "ai agents for marketing". Score against our ICP of B2B growth teams and cluster into pages.
Nineteen clusters are worth building, led by "ai agents for marketing" as a pillar with four comparison clusters beneath it. Two clusters would cannibalize existing pages — fold those into the current URLs instead of publishing new ones.
A keyword research template that stops at volume and difficulty leaves the expensive decision unmade: which of these terms is worth a page. This one scores every candidate against your positioning and buying intent, clusters what remains, and tells you the page type each cluster needs.
A structured way to move from seed terms to a decision. It records volume, difficulty, and cost per click for each candidate, adds intent and business relevance, then groups survivors into clusters that map to individual pages rather than a flat list you sort by volume.
Informational queries want explainers and guides, commercial queries want comparisons and listicles, and transactional queries want product or pricing pages. The template classifies each cluster and assigns the format, which is what stops teams from writing blog posts for queries that need a product page.
As a filter relative to your own authority, not as an absolute. The template reads the actual ranking pages: if page one is dominated by domains far stronger than yours with no thin results among them, difficulty is real regardless of the score — and a low score with three forum threads ranking is an opening.
Because one page can rank for dozens of variants. Clustering groups terms that share intent and SERP overlap, so you build one strong page instead of five thin ones competing with each other for the same query.
Yes. The output is structured so you can paste it into Sheets or Airtable with volume, difficulty, intent, cluster, assigned page type, and priority as columns — the difference is that the scoring and clustering arrive already done.
The agent pulls volume, difficulty, cost per click, and SERP composition from live keyword data, reads your existing pages to check for cannibalization, and uses workspace Knowledge — positioning, ICP, tracked competitors — to score relevance. Output goes to the content roadmap template, a spreadsheet, or straight into briefs.
Three to ten seeds covering your category, the problem you solve, and your competitors.
The agent proposes criteria from your positioning; adjust if a segment matters more this quarter.
Each cluster arrives with its terms, intent, assigned page type, and a cannibalization check against your site.
Approved clusters flow into the content brief template or the SEO content roadmap.
Scores business relevance, so high-volume irrelevant terms get dropped
Delivers clusters and page types rather than a flat keyword list
Checks cannibalization against pages you already have
Includes the sub-queries AI answer engines fan out to
Volume, difficulty, cost per click, intent, business relevance, cluster assignment, target page type, and a cannibalization check. The last three are what most spreadsheet templates omit, and they are where the actual decisions live.
Filter for queries your product can credibly serve, then check whether the ranking pages are beatable. High volume with no commercial fit is a distraction; moderate volume with weak competitors and clear buying intent is the opportunity.
One cluster, which usually means one primary term and ten to fifty variants. Splitting a cluster across pages creates competitors on your own domain.
Yes. Alongside standalone queries, the template captures the sub-queries assistants generate when decomposing a prompt, since those are what your page has to answer to get cited.