Turn a one-off baseline into a repeatable sheet — prompts, engines, run count, and share — that you diff each month to see where citations moved.
Build a monitoring sheet for our "ai marketing agent" prompts across ChatGPT and Perplexity.
Citation share moved from 12% to 18%, and the wording shifted from "an ai marketing tool" to "an ai marketing platform" — a perception upgrade that tracks the FAQ rewrite. Two prompts are newly cited; one drifted down and needs a refresh.
An ai visibility monitoring template is the sheet that turns a baseline into a habit. It records the prompt set, the engines, the run count, and the share of answer for each prompt, then diffs against the prior run so the monthly review shows what moved and why. A baseline measures once; a monitoring sheet measures over time, which is what visibility actually is.
A structured sheet — prompts as rows, engines and run count as columns, share of answer as the value — that you diff each month. The shape is what makes it repeatable: the same prompts, the same engines, the same run count, so two months are comparable.
Prompt, engine, run count, mention share, citation share, and the wording used to describe your category. The wording column is the one teams skip — it is the one that tells you how a buyer who has never visited your site forms their impression.
As a trend per prompt, not a single number. Share that swings every run is noise; share that holds or moves over months is the signal. The sheet plots the trend so a spike or a drift is visible against the baseline.
Because share does not tell you what was said. The log captures the exact wording each engine used to describe you, so when share moves you can see whether the description improved or degraded — the part that actually drives buyer perception.
The agent runs the prompt set across engines, writes the share and wording to Sheets or Notion, and diffs against the prior run. It pairs with the AI visibility baseline so the baseline sets the method and this sheet runs it monthly.
The same prompts each month — comparability depends on it.
Agent executes, records share, and captures wording.
The report flags prompts where share moved.
Drifts feed the extractability audit or the citation review.
Turns a baseline into a repeatable habit
Captures wording, not just share — the part that drives perception
Diffs each month so movement is visible
Pairs with the baseline and the fix templates
Run the same prompt set across the same engines each month, record share of answer, and diff against the prior run. A baseline measures once; a monitoring sheet measures the trend, which is what visibility actually is.
Prompt, engine, run count, mention share, citation share, and the wording used to describe your category. The wording column is the one teams skip and the one that tells you how buyers perceive you.
Monthly for prompts that map to revenue, quarterly for the long tail. The same prompt set each run is what makes two months comparable — change the set and the trend breaks.
Share that holds steady or moves consistently, not share that swings every run. A baseline of 30% that climbs is healthier than 80% that swings — the swing means the engine is uncertain about you.