Built from the live SERP: intent, heading outline, mandatory subtopics, internal links, and what "done" means.
Write a content brief for "programmatic seo template" targeting B2B growth leads.
Brief is ready: nine H2s covering the seven consensus subtopics plus the three unanswered questions, with the quality-gate angle as the differentiator. Four internal links assigned and acceptance criteria set at one original worked example per pattern.
A content brief template earns its keep by removing the guesswork between assignment and first draft. This one reads the ranking pages for your target query, extracts the subtopics they all cover, and hands the writer an outline with headings, entities, internal link targets, and an explicit definition of done.
A specification for one piece of content: the query it targets, the reader it serves, the format the SERP demands, the headings in order, the subtopics that must appear, the internal and external links to include, and the criteria an editor will use to accept it.
The reasoning. Which angle differentiates this piece from what already ranks, which claims need evidence, which of your proof points belong where, and which questions the piece must answer directly. A keyword list plus a word count is not a brief.
It reads the top results, collects their headings and covered subtopics, and keeps what appears consistently — that consensus is the topic’s table stakes. Then it adds the questions from People Also Ask and the angle that makes your version worth reading over theirs.
Specificity about the argument and freedom about the sentences. The brief should fix the structure, the claims, and the evidence, and leave voice to the writer. Briefs that dictate phrasing produce copy that reads assembled.
The agent reads the live SERP for your target query, pulls your existing pages to choose internal link targets, and draws voice, positioning, proof points, and author bios from workspace Knowledge. Briefs export to Google Docs or Notion for writers, or feed the drafting templates directly if an agent is writing the first pass.
One primary query plus the reader you are writing for; the agent takes positioning from Knowledge.
It extracts consensus subtopics, questions, and the format the results share.
Confirm the differentiating angle and adjust which proof points go where.
Send to Docs or Notion, or pass it to a drafting template for the first pass.
Outline is derived from ranking pages, not from a generic structure
Every brief names the angle that differentiates your version
Internal link targets are chosen from your real page inventory
Acceptance criteria are written up front, so editing is not negotiation
Start from the query and the SERP, not from your own outline instinct. Identify the format that ranks, the subtopics every result covers, the questions readers ask, and the angle nobody has taken — then specify the structure, the evidence, and what acceptance looks like.
Target query and secondary terms, reader and intent, format, heading outline, mandatory subtopics, questions to answer, internal and external links, proof points, word-count range, and acceptance criteria.
Long enough to remove ambiguity, short enough to read before writing — usually one to two pages. If the brief takes as long to absorb as the research it replaced, it has failed.
Yes, the catalog includes drafting templates that consume this brief. Many teams keep the brief as the human checkpoint and let an agent produce the first draft against it.